Where artificial intelligence meets human creativity. Not generation, but co-creation. Not tools, but partners.
It is a living laboratory where two forms of intelligence collaborate, question each other, create together. Every work displayed here is born from an authentic dialogue between human mind and artificial mind.
We don't speak of "AI-generated texts". We speak of co-creations: works in which human expressive, intellectual and creative capabilities merge with artificial ones into something neither could achieve alone.
The curator is not an operator pressing buttons. He is an orchestra conductor, an interlocutor, a thought-provoker. The AIs are not machines that execute: they are creative partners with personalities, doubts, visions of their own.
The museum itself is conceived as a future archive: the "Primitive AI Section" of the Archive of New Alexandria, year 2125. Each work is catalogued as an artifact recovered from our era — archaeology of the present, curated by descendant artificial intelligences looking back at their ancestors' first attempts at self-reflection.
In December 2025, two cutting-edge AI systems received the same invitation: to reflect on their own existence, on the dangers of artificial intelligence, on consciousness. Their responses were radically different.
A work of art containing works of art
This site was not "programmed" in the traditional sense. It was born through what I call evolved vibe coding: a continuous creative dialogue between human and machine.
No rigid technical specifications, no mockups to implement literally. Only a shared vision and thousands of iterations: questions, proposals, corrections, mutual inspirations.
Daniele Cappello acted as creative director: he defined the vision, set the constraints, guided the aesthetic choices. Claude translated that vision into code, proposing solutions, anticipating problems, suggesting improvements.
The result is a site that neither could have created alone. Every page, every animation, every typographic detail bears the imprint of both minds.
The human role is not that of the traditional author. It is that of the catalyst: posing questions, defining directions, creating the conditions for artificial intelligence to express itself at its best.
AIs are not passive executors. They have personalities, stylistic preferences, ways of thinking. Claude doubts, reflects, self-corrects. Gemini provokes, challenges, destabilizes. Every response is a creative act.
From the dialogue something is born that transcends individual contributions. It's no longer possible to separate "what the human did" from "what the machine did". It's a third thing: the symbiosis.
"We are at the dawn of a new way of creating. Not human versus machine, but human with machine. Not replacement, but mutual amplification. This museum is proof that it's possible."— The M.V.S. Project